List the assessment methods to be used and the context and resources required for assessment. Copy and paste the relevant sections from the evidence guide below and then re-write these in plain English.
Elements describe the essential outcomes. | Performance criteria describe the performance needed to demonstrate achievement of the element. |
1 | Identify information need/deficiency | 1.1 | Identify the need for documentation in accordance with company requirements |
| 1.2 | Evaluate current documentation where existent |
| 1.3 | Define information need/deficiency |
| 1.4 | Discuss information requirements with appropriate personnel |
|
2 | Develop plant documentation | 2.1 | Specify information need and set/prioritise objectives |
| 2.2 | Analyse existing documentation/records in accordance with specified requirements |
| 2.3 | Source information and determine operating principles, best practice and other content as required. |
| 2.4 | Develop/amend documentation as a draft in accordance with specifications to standard format |
| 2.5 | Issue documentation to appropriate personnel for review |
| 2.6 | Edit documentation and amend in accordance with review requirements |
| 2.7 | Complete documentation to satisfy the initial identified need/deficiency |
|
3 | Communicate changes to plant documentation | 3.1 | Explain and communicate documentation to all relevant personnel |
| 3.2 | Distribute documentation to all appropriate personnel |
| 3.3 | Evaluate implementation of documentation |
| 3.4 | Amend documents, if required |
Evidence required to demonstrate competence in this unit must be relevant to and satisfy the requirements of the elements and performance criteria, and include the ability to:
review and interpret a range of relevant sources of information and select relevant content
communicate and consult effectively with all stakeholders
clearly convey complex/technical information in writing
use language, structures and formats that are appropriate to information needs, the reader and organisation requirements.
Evidence must be provided that demonstrates knowledge of:
principles of operation of plant/equipment
process-specific science (e.g. physics, chemistry and biochemistry) and mathematics
organisation procedures, including those covering:
information systems
data management
quality
safety, emergency and hazard control
policy/procedure development
document control and approvals
style guides and standards for documentation
use of internet
relevant standard operating procedures
standard codes of practice relevant to developing plant documentation
sources of information, including:
manufacturing specifications
product specifications
company policies and procedures
customer requirements
industry/work place codes of practice
state/territory work health and safety (WHS) legislation and regulations
ISO and other industry standards and regulations
industry associations, networks and professional bodies.
The unit should be assessed holistically and the judgement of competence based on a holistic assessment of the evidence.
The collection of performance evidence:
should occur over a range of situations which include typical disruptions to normal, smooth operations
will typically include a supervisor/third-party report focusing on consistent performance and problem recognition and solving. A supervisor/third-party report must be prepared by someone who has a direct, relevant, current relationship with the person being assessed and who is in a position to form a judgement on workplace performance relevant to the unit of competency
must include developing and/or amending at least two (2) types of plant documentation, the use of appropriate tools, equipment and safety gear requiring demonstration of preparation, operation, completion and responding to problems
may use industry-based simulation for part of the unit particularly where safety, lack of opportunity or significant cost is an issue.
Assessment should occur in operational workplace situations. Where this is not possible, or where personal safety or environmental damage are limiting factors, assessment must occur in a sufficiently rigorous simulated environment reflecting realistic operational workplace conditions. This must cover all aspects of workplace performance, including environment, task skills, task management skills, contingency management skills and job role environment skills.
Assessment in a simulated environment should use evidence collected from one or more of:
walk-throughs
pilot plant operation
demonstration of skills
industry-based case studies/scenarios
‘what ifs’.
Knowledge evidence may be collected concurrently with performance evidence (provided a record is kept) or through an independent process, such as workbooks, written assessments or interviews (provided a record is kept).
Assessment processes and techniques must be appropriate to the language, literacy and numeracy requirements of the work being performed and the needs of the candidate.
Conditions for assessment must include access to all tools, equipment, materials and documentation required, including relevant workplace procedures, product and manufacturing specifications associated with this unit.
The regulatory framework will be reflected in workplace policies and procedures and is not required to be independently assessed.
Foundation skills are integral to competent performance of the unit and should not be assessed separately.
Assessors must satisfy the assessor competency requirements that are in place at the time of the assessment as set by the VET regulator.
In addition, the assessor or anyone acting in subject matter expert role in assessment must demonstrate both technical competency and currency. If the assessor cannot demonstrate technical competency and currency they must assess with a subject matter expert who does meet these requirements.
Technical competence can be demonstrated through one or more of:
relevant VET or other qualification/Statement of Attainment
appropriate workplace experience undertaking the type of work being assessed under routine and non-routine conditions
appropriate workplace experience supervising/evaluating the type of work being assessed under routine and non-routine conditions
Currency can be demonstrated through one or more of:
being currently employed undertaking the type of work being assessed
being employed by the organisation undertaking the type of work being assessed and having maintained currency in accordance with that organisation’s policies and procedures
having consulted/had contact with an organisation undertaking the type of work being assessed within the last twelve months, the consultation/contact being related to assessment
conducting on-the-job training/assessments of the type of work being assessed
being an active member of a relevant professional body and participating in activities relevant to the assessment of this type of work.